Here. I thought I would insert this here.
Stacy outlines perfectly how the Borg can manipulate, distort and hide previous doctrines to suit their own narrative,
Beth Sarim
JoinedPosts by Beth Sarim
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
The eronious foundation of WT Borg theology hinges on the flimsy 607BCE 1914 theology.
Its dependant on it.
The Borg will just 'say' it less,,less & less.
Then 'scrub' it from their online library.
Manipulative.
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
The Borg has a way of 'scrapping" old light and reinventing itself.
Patterns. Yes patterns.
There was a youtuber a few weeks ago who uploaded a video by a talk given by GB member Gerrit Loesch. The word ""truth"" was uttered 120 times in 7 minutes.
Its called mind control.
Well same thing when it comes to the eronious 607 & 1914 theology narrative.
Say it less,less,less & less.....
Same tactic but in reverse.
Stacy last week on his Surviving Paradise touched on this perfectly.
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
Chucky is kicked to the curb.
They can boot Rutherford too.
Just the way the Borg reinvents itself.
And by scrapping old literature and going completely online.
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
Yes. Many have commented. About patterns.
Patterns of the Borg mentioning things less,,less & less until "something" is forgotten.
Its part of mind control. Or programming.
-
-
-
Beth Sarim
""Belief and faith are not evidence"".
You can believe in something as deeply devoted as possible until you're blue in the face and sweating blood.
It doesn't necessarily always mean its true, or evidence
BTW,,, welcome to the forum.
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
By dropping the 607BCE date,, the Borg paints itself into another corner.
One of the corners it has done over the years.
If they do, they can never get out of it. By scrapping the 607BCE 1914 doctrine.
And the entire building collapses.
You never know though.
-
153
When JW.org drops 607BCE...
by Nathan Natas inprobably everyone else thought of this long ago, but i, being an "independent thunker" thunk of it just a coupla weeks ago.. we all know that since the year zero (on the fredfranzian calendar) the wtb&ts has defied archaeology and insisted that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 bce, even though the physical evidence shows that 587 bce is a more likely date.
in fact, the book "the gentile times reconsidered: have jehovah's witnesses been wrong all along about 607 bce?
" by carl olof jonsson and rud persson made this conversation public.. it is a difference of 20 years.
-
-
Beth Sarim
Without the 607BCE date the Borg clings to uphold their 1914 narrative,,,, this I believe is the cornerstone of Borg theology
Because without that ,,, Christ could not have been empowered to inspect the religions and chosen the IBSA in 1919.
I know,,I know.
The Borg is notorious for moving goalposts & making things up as they go along. Therefore,,,,I am with you as nothing would surprise me either anymore.
Because,,,its evident and factual that Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians in 587/586 BCE. Obliterating the Borgs 607 & 1914 theology.
-
26
Im hearing some say that the Org is about to reverse the No Blood policy - about to change...
by BeaverEater inuh, i wonder if that is true... hearing this from friends within bethel... gonna laugh my ass of if they change this....
-
-
Beth Sarim
Balaamsass:
Thanks for clarifying this.
Here in Canada I'm not aware such HIPPA laws or Privacy things. Or I'm just not familiar with them.
But yeah,, thanks for putting this on here.
Privacy rule,,imprisonment & a $50,000 fine,,wow.
But you gotta watch over your shoulders.. Theres always some rat working in Hospitals,, insurance or data entry who wouldn't hesitate to tell on you.
-
-
-
Beth Sarim
"Many forms of Christianity use the carrot and stick""
"JWs just use a different carrot and stick to control their believers".
Just different forms of control. Methods. Instilling fear in them ,,, infantilizing & the demands of the organization.